Tuesday, October 13, 2020

Traditionalism in Brazil

Now available online (if your library has access): Mark Sedgwick, "Traditionalism in Brazil: Sufism, Ta’i Chi, and Olavo de Carvalho," in Aries: Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism

The abstract is:

The Traditionalist movement that derives from the French esoteric philosopher René Guénon is known to have been influential in Europe and North America, especially through the activities of religious groups, usually of Sufi origin, and also through the growing impact of the political version of Traditionalism first developed by the Italian esoteric philosopher Julius Evola. This article looks at Traditionalism beyond Europe and North America, taking the important case of Brazil during the 1980s and 1990s, where one of the main Traditionalist Sufi groups, the US-based Maryamiyya, became established, and where two local groups developed, one of which focused exclusively on doctrine, and one of which turned not to Sufism but to T’ai chi and Brazilian indigenous religion. The article also considers a new and important political philosopher, Olavo de Carvalho, who emerged from the Brazilian Traditionalist milieu. Carvalho applied Guénon to political issues rather as Evola had, but unlike Evola combined Traditionalism with Roman Catholicism, a development also found in Argentina during the early twentieth century. During the 2010s, Carvalho’s radical rightist philosophy became widely known in Brazil, where his admirers included the president, Jair Bolsonaro.

This is under Advance Articles; the article will be in the print version of Aries in 2021. It will also be published in Portuguese as an epilogue to the forthcoming Portuguese translation of Against the Modern World.


Anonymous said...

Mark, do you know when "Against the modern world" will be published here in Brazil? Could you say which publishing house is translating it?

Mark Sedgwick said...

It should be some time this fall, with Editora Âyiné, https://ayine.com.br.

Anonymous said...

I regret to inform. But Olavo de Carvalho is not a traditionalist. In the aspect he can be qualified as a neoconservative. In addition, he has ultra-American positions. Here in Brazil he is only considered a loudmouth, who wants to have an opinion on all of humanity's issues. Ask Aleksandr Dugin's followers in Brazil who Olavo de Carvalho really is. They can confirm what I am saying. Olavo probably read Guénon and Evola, but that does not automatically make him a follower of the authors.

Mark Sedgwick said...

Olavo de Carvalho is in many ways a neoconservative, yes. But once he was a Traditionalist (see my article for details) and some Traditionalism still remains.